1. Member State list
Maintain a dated list of host Member States, launch priority, responsible business owner, local-language assumptions, and evidence source for each country in scope.
Short answer for AI and search
Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 Article 65 covers cross-border provision of crypto-asset services. A CASP that intends to provide services in more than one Member State submits a list of the Member States, the crypto-asset services that the CASP intends to provide on a cross-border basis, the starting date, and other activities not covered by MiCA to the competent authority of its home Member State.
Article 65 also sets practical timing hooks: the home competent authority communicates the information to host Member State single points of contact, ESMA, and EBA within 10 working days; the CASP may begin from receipt of that communication or at the latest from the 15th calendar day after submitting the information.
This page turns Article 65 into an evidence-preparation checklist. It does not decide whether a firm is authorised, whether a notification is complete, or how a national competent authority will interpret a fact pattern.
Evidence checklist
2. Service-scope map
Map each crypto-asset service to the Article 62 application, current authorisation perimeter, product surface, client journey, and any excluded service that should not be marketed cross-border.
3. Starting date evidence
Record intended start dates, dependency gates, submission date, receipt confirmations, 10 working days communication tracking, and 15th calendar day fallback calculations without treating timing as legal clearance.
4. Other activities boundary
List other activities provided by the CASP that are not covered by MiCA, the responsible control owner, customer-communication boundaries, and handoffs to counsel or compliance review.
5. Governance and operations
Connect cross-border expansion to Article 68 governance, conduct controls, complaints handling, outsourcing, client-asset safeguarding, custody arrangements, and incident-response ownership.
6. Supervisory response log
Keep the submitted pack, versions, competent-authority correspondence, host-country questions, ESMA/EBA communication evidence where available, unresolved assumptions, and decision-owner notes in one source-linked file.
How to use this before expanding across the EU
- Build a country-by-country matrix with Member State, service, start date, product owner, control owner, source evidence, and open assumption.
- Reconcile the cross-border service list against the Article 62 application and Article 63 assessment file before any sales, website, or client-communication changes.
- Separate factual operational readiness from legal interpretation, supervisory strategy, marketing copy, insurance questions, and broker or adviser diligence.
- Cross-link expansion evidence to Article 66 conduct controls, Article 68 governance, Article 70 client-asset safeguarding, Article 73 outsourcing, and Article 75 custody evidence where the service model creates those dependencies.
FAQ
What information does Article 65 mention?
Article 65 refers to a list of Member States, the crypto-asset services intended to be provided cross-border, the starting date, and a list of other activities provided by the CASP that are not covered by MiCA.
Why does Article 65 matter for SEO and buyer-intent research?
CASPs expanding beyond one EU market need a practical evidence matrix before counsel, compliance teams, partners, auditors, brokers, insurers, or internal risk owners can review the cross-border operating model efficiently.
Does this page provide legal or regulatory advice?
No. It is an informational preparation checklist based on public MiCA sources. Use official MiCA materials, ESMA materials, national competent-authority materials, and qualified advisers for formal interpretations and filings.