Instrument universe
Maintain a register of crypto-assets admitted to trading, assets with a request for admission to trading, admission status dates, venue references, issuer or offeror links, and source-owner notes.
MiCA market-abuse scope evidence
A source-backed, conservative evidence checklist for CASPs, venues, issuers, and compliance teams mapping when MiCA market-abuse rules can touch crypto-assets, orders, transactions, and behaviour.
Informational only. Not legal, regulatory, brokerage, underwriting, or insurance advice.
Scope of the rules on market abuse: Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 Article 86 applies the market-abuse title to acts carried out by any person concerning crypto-assets that are admitted to trading or in respect of which a request for admission to trading has been made.
It also covers any transaction, order or behaviour concerning those crypto-assets, whether or not the transaction, order or behaviour takes place on a trading platform, and it covers actions and omissions in the Union and in third countries.
This page is a control-mapping checklist. It is not a legal interpretation, market-abuse determination, surveillance recommendation, filing guide, broker recommendation, or assurance that any activity is inside or outside MiCA scope.
Maintain a register of crypto-assets admitted to trading, assets with a request for admission to trading, admission status dates, venue references, issuer or offeror links, and source-owner notes.
Preserve order lifecycle records, transaction identifiers, venue or off-venue context, timestamps, cancellations, amendments, rejections, and reconciliation status for scoped crypto-assets.
Document surveillance triggers, escalation notes, communications, account or wallet links, conflicts context, and rationale for closing or escalating behaviour reviews.
Map workflows where scoped transactions, orders, or behaviour can occur outside a trading platform, including OTC, internalization, routing, transfer, custody, and affiliate dependencies.
Tag Union and third-country touchpoints, involved entities, venues, clients, service desks, and outsourced systems so cross-border assumptions are explicit and reviewable.
Connect Article 86 scoping evidence to Article 66 conduct, Article 68 governance, Article 72 conflicts, Article 73 outsourcing, and Article 76-78 trading and order-flow files.
Article 86 defines the scope of MiCA's market-abuse rules for crypto-assets admitted to trading or where a request for admission to trading has been made, including related transactions, orders, behaviour, actions, and omissions.
No. Article 86 expressly refers to transactions, orders, or behaviour whether or not they take place on a trading platform, so the evidence map should also consider off-platform workflows and dependencies.
Market-abuse scope files can expose operational-risk questions around surveillance, communications, conflicts, outsourcing, order records, incident handling, and governance. Those evidence gaps can matter in counsel, auditor, partner, broker, insurer, or internal-risk review, without turning the page into insurance advice.