Custody/security provider
Digital-asset protection and recovery technology provider for crypto businesses and institutions.
Why we list them: Relevant adjacent provider for custody, operational risk, and security controls that CASPs may need to demonstrate.
Source: coincover.com
Custody/security provider
Digital-asset custody, wallet, and transfer infrastructure for institutions and crypto businesses.
Why we list them: Custody and wallet controls are relevant to CASP operational risk, safeguarding, and institutional infrastructure needs.
Source: fireblocks.com
Custody/security provider
Institutional digital-asset custody provider backed by financial-services and digital-asset partners.
Why we list them: Custody providers are adjacent to CASP safeguarding and operational-risk requirements.
Source: komainu.com
Custody/security provider
Institutional digital-asset custody provider connected to the Standard Chartered ecosystem, with public MiCA-license material available from Zodia Custody.
Why we list them: Relevant to CASP custody, safeguarding, operational controls, Article 75 custody-liability evidence, and institutional digital-asset infrastructure mapping.
Source: zodia.io
How to use this list
A directory is a starting point, not a shortlist. Look at what each firm publishes, what regulators they've actually filed with, and what their team looks like before you take a meeting. The point of a directory is to save you the cold-search; the point of a shortlist is to save you the cold call.
Spotted a firm we should add - or a listing that's wrong?
Send us the source →