Local substance
A registered office in the Netherlands and management effectively based there under Article 59(2).
Directory · Netherlands
How crypto-asset service providers get authorised in the Netherlands under MiCA: the AFM route, the Article 62 and 63 clocks, what the regulator expects, and how the prior DNB registration regime shaped the Dutch CASP approach.
Competent authority: Autoriteit Financiele Markten (AFM)
As of June 2026; figures drift and transitional dates trace to the ESMA grandfathering list. Capital is set EU-wide by service class (€50,000 / €125,000 / €150,000), not by country. Compare member states on the jurisdiction comparison and confirm exact dates on the deadlines page.
The Netherlands pairs a pragmatic, internationally minded market with a respected supervisory tradition. Crypto firms previously registered with De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) under the anti-money-laundering regime. Under MiCA’s crypto-asset service provider regime, applying from 30 December 2024, the Autoriteit Financiele Markten (AFM) is the authorising authority, with DNB involved on prudential matters.
The AFM has a reputation for being responsive and clear. The Netherlands suits firms that want an efficient, English-comfortable process and a credible EU regulator.
This page is informational and does not replace legal, regulatory, or tax advice. Confirm current requirements, forms, fees, and timelines directly with the AFM before acting.
A firm that is not already an EU-authorised financial entity applies to the AFM for authorisation as a CASP under Article 62. A firm already authorised under EU financial law can use the lighter Article 60 notification.
Under Article 63 the AFM has 25 working days to confirm completeness and then 40 working days to decide once the file is complete. The AFM tends to give clear feedback, but a complete, well-evidenced file is still what moves the clock.
A registered office in the Netherlands and management effectively based there under Article 59(2).
Collective crypto-asset competence and sufficient time under Article 68, with assessment of directors and qualifying shareholders.
The Dutch market came through a demanding DNB anti-money-laundering registration, so expect close attention to AML, sanctions, and the custody and segregation duties in Article 75.
Own funds, an insurance policy, a comparable guarantee, or a mix under Article 67, at the higher of the class minimum or one quarter of fixed overheads.
The minimum is 50,000 euro, 125,000 euro, or 150,000 euro depending on the services you are authorised for, or one quarter of the previous year’s fixed overheads if higher. If you are weighing insurance against capital, build the evidence first: see the CASP insurance evidence pack and own funds vs insurance.
Firms registered with DNB under the anti-money-laundering regime do not convert automatically to a CASP authorisation. They transition onto MiCA through a process the AFM manages. If you hold a DNB registration, confirm the current cut-off date and the exact transition steps with the AFM.
Transitional dates have moved at the member-state level. Confirm any date against current AFM guidance before planning around it.
The AFM’s clarity helps prepared teams move efficiently. The strongest Dutch files combine genuine local substance, strong AML and custody controls carried over from the DNB era, and prudential safeguards backed by evidence.
Yes. A CASP authorisation passports to all 27 member states under Article 65. You authorise in the Netherlands and notify the host states before providing services there.
Not automatically. It transitions through an AFM-managed process. Confirm the current cut-off and steps with the AFM.
The legal decision clock is 40 working days after the file is complete, plus a 25 working day completeness check. Preparing a complete file usually takes several months.
Or browse by service
No firms are listed under Netherlands yet. Browse the full directory or filter by service and jurisdiction.